Делаем ставки, господа!

Есть, и они мне не нравятся.
Если эта статья верна, то на почтальона было оказано очень серьезное давление сверху, чтобы он отказался от своего изначального утверждения:
He was placed on unpaid suspension by the USPS. He was harassed by “a representative of the postal worker union who began asking me about old allegations against me, which have long been resolved.”
In case he lost his job, he set up a GoFundMe account, with the help of Project Veritas. GoFundMe froze the account.
Then on Monday he was interrogated by Strasser and agent Charles Klein for four hours and they convinced him to “amend” his affidavit.
Luckily for Hopkins, he recorded the whole conversation on his phone and Project Veritas released the recording last night.

In the recording, Strasser begins with a series of oily compliments.

“This is why l already like you,” says Strasser, “because you’re a marine and you know what integrity is . . . You and I both served this country and I know you love this country.”
Strasser tells Hopkins, “My goal is to protect you . . . I’m in your corner on this. I want to take care of you.”
Then he threatens him, in the nicest way, over the GoFundMe account being treated as “ill-gotten” gains.
“I am not scaring you, but I am scaring you here . . . it can be argued that money was gained by . . . deceptions . . . you could be held accountable.”
Over and over, Hopkins is asked to repeat verbatim the words he heard Weisenbach using.
He is taken out onto the post office floor to re-enact the moment, and Strasser makes him think he was too far away to really hear what he heard.
Inch by inch, Strasser wears away at his memory, until Hopkins obligingly agrees he had made a “logical assumption” that the ballots were being backdated but had not heard Weisenbach use the word “backdated.”
Strasser tells him, “I am trying to twist you a little bit.”
Toward the end of the interrogation, as Strasser is dictating out loud the amendments to his affidavit, Hopkins realizes the final product is not the full picture, that his apprehension that something fishy was going on has been whitewashed from the document.
Hopkins tries to get the agents to understand the other suspicions he had about late ballots.
“The picking up of the ballots and turning them directly to the supervisor rather than putting them in the ‘mailstream,’ that’s kind of important,” he says.

Agent Charles Klein butts in: “Those were your assumptions. Right?”
Hopkins keeps trying. “See that’s the thing about these ballots — it’s the validity of us picking them up.
“It’s so weird that we’re picking up ballots [after Election Day] because at this point they are no longer valid . . . Wouldn’t it be best to inform somebody that, hey . . . they’re no longer valid . . . Or wouldn’t it make sense to send it to Pittsburgh where . . . it would be postmarked. I mean, they wanted it separated rather than being just thrown in the [mailstream] which we were doing right before, a week before . . . that just didn’t make sense to me.”
Hopkins was right. It didn’t make sense.
But the agents didn’t seem to think any of it was suspicious.
They had what they came for.
The next day, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee tweeted that “the whistleblower completely RECANTED his allegations.”
The Washington Post blared: “Postal worker recanted allegations of ballot tampering.”
Hopkins denies that he recanted his story.
“They were grilling the hell out of me. I feel like I just got played,” he told Project Veritas. “I did not recant my statements.”

Подпишусь под каждым словом, Марина.

Какой визой? Куда визой?

Мне что, теперь читать все, что было написано с четверга?

Я тут огорчена:
я в четверг вечером пила с друзьями, они (а они люди надежные) сказали с ссылкой на своего друга, работающего во Фрайзере, что Фрайзер нарочно сообщил публике о том, что вакцина создана, на 3 недели позже, чтобы Трамп не приписал себе это в заслугу.
Ни мне, ни им - такое путание политики с наукой не нравится.